Quality of working life among teachers of an educational institution in the city of Medellin in 2018
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper aims to describe the quality of working life by measuring the perception of working conditions, organization and demands of work, motivation, values, engagement, stress and the burnout syndrome. This is a case study with a quantitative method and an analytical empirical approach according to the descriptive transectional design. The population universe consisted of 24 teachers from a public education institution in Medellin, to whom the International Questionnaire on Quality of Work Life of Human Services Organizations was administered in 2018. As part of the findings of the research study, the domains assessed to establish the quality of working life yielded neither no nor low conditions. The conclusions highlight the need to preventively manage the domains with their dimensions and items that appear in acceptable conditions with a need for improvement, so they do not become risk factors for the quality of working life in the institution.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The designated authors will retain copyright of all papers and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously published under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows third parties to share the work, as long as its author is attributed and this journal is identified as the original publisher.
Authors may enter into separate, additional non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published work (e.g., post it to an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) as long as this journal is acknowledged as the original publisher.
References
Barbosa Ramírez, L. C; Muñoz Ortega, M. L; Rueda Villamizar, P. X; y Suárez Leiton, K. G. (2009). Síndrome de Burnout y estrategias de afrontamiento en docentes universitarios. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología: Ciencia y Tecnología. 2(1), 21-30. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2JYfp3o
Blanch, J. M; Sahagún, M; Cantera, L; y Cervantes, G. (2010). Cuestionario de bienestar laboral general: Estructura y propiedades psicométricas. Revista de Psicología y Trabajo de las Organizaciones. 26(2), 157-170. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2KxnXxo
Comisión Europea. (1999). Guía sobre el estrés relacionado con el trabajo ¿La «sal de la vida» o el «beso de la muerte»? Dirección General de Empleo y Asuntos Sociales. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/1ifi9AD
Congreso de Colombia. Ley 115 de 1994. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2lTUJho
Cornfield, D. B. (2006). Tendencias mundiales recientes en la sociología del trabajo. En: De la Garza, E. (Coord.). Tratado Latinoamericano de Sociología. P.122-132. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Declaración de Bolonia. (1999). Recuperado de http://www.mat.ucm.es/~arrondo/Declaracion_Bolonia.pdf
Hernández Sampieri, R; Fernández Collado, C; y Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. 6 ed. México: McGraw-Hill.
López, A. (sf). La Nueva Gestión Pública: Principios Teóricos e Implicancias Prácticas en el Quehacer de la Administración Estatal. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2W9TrMx
Ministerio de la Protección Social y Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. (2010). Batería de instrumentos para la evaluación de factores de riesgos psicosocial. Manual general. Bogotá: Ministerio de la Protección Social. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2QMbO99
Ministerio del Trabajo y Organización Iberoamericana de Seguridad Social. (2015). Segunda encuesta nacional de condiciones de seguridad y salud en el trabajo en el sistema general de riesgos laborales de Colombia. Bogotá: Ministerio del Trabajo. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2Z0WVTc