Spatial Representation of the Educational Institution and the Virtuality Study Space

Main Article Content

Carolina Suárez Martínez
Valentina Ardila López

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated numerous problems that have modified the relationships and the perception of the environment. Both public and private educational institutions are no exception, given the changes in the representation of these spaces made by students, teachers and the educational community in general. This research aimed to understand the spatial representation of the educational institution and virtuality as a study space for high school students from Colegio La Salle Envigado after the COVID-19 emergency. The methodology, which had a qualitative approach, followed a phenomenological method and was conducted with 11 students from that institution. The data collection techniques used were the semi-structured interview, the social cartography and the non-participant observation as a cross-sectional technique. In summary, this study evidenced that said representation is built based on the quality of learning, the relationship dynamics, the benefits and comforts that the space can provide, and the practices that may or may not be possible considering the conditions imposed by the sanitary emergency. At the end of the document, the meanings of institutional and virtual space are discussed in terms of teaching-learning methodology, appropriation and school socio-spatial dynamics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Suárez Martínez, C., & Ardila López, V. (2022). Spatial Representation of the Educational Institution and the Virtuality Study Space. RHS-Revista Humanismo Y Sociedad, 10(2), e4/1 – 12. https://doi.org/10.22209/rhs.v10n2a04
Section
Scientific and technological research article
Author Biographies

Carolina Suárez Martínez, Universidad Católica Luis Amigó

Psicóloga, Universidad Católica Luis Amigó.

Valentina Ardila López, Universidad Católica Luis Amigó

Psicóloga, Universidad Católica Luis Amigó.

References

Arias, N., & Rincón, W. U. (2021). Educación básica y media durante el aislamiento social en la pandemia de COVID-19: Implicaciones para el derecho a la educación. Panorama, 15(29), 176-204. https://doi.org/10.15765/pnrm.v15i29.2622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15765/pnrm.v15i29.2622

Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and environment, 59(13), 678-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.016

Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013

Campos, G., & Martínez, N. E. (2012). La observación, un método para el estudio de la realidad. Xihmai, 7(13), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.37646/xihmai.v7i13.202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37646/xihmai.v7i13.202

Cuadra, D., Castro, P. J., Sandoval, J., Pérez, D., & Mora, D. (2020). COVID-19 y comportamiento psicológico: revisión sistemática de los efectos psicológicos de las pandemias del siglo XXI. Revista médica de Chile, 148(8), 1139-1154. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872020000801139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872020000801139

Ghiso, A. (1996). Métodos de la investigación cualitativa. Ediciones Aljibe.

Haghighi, M. M., & Jusan, M. M. (2012). Exploring students behavior on seating arrangements in learning environment: a review. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 287-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.032

Iracheta, A. X. (2020). La ciudad que quisiéramos después de COVID-19. ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, 15(43), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.5821/ace.15.43.9512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.15.43.9512

Manahasa, O., Özsoy, A., & Manahasa, E. (2021). Evaluative, inclusive, participatory: Developing a new language with children for school building design. Building and Environment, 188, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107374

Martínez Miguélez, M. (2004). Ciencia y arte en la metodología cualitativa. Trillas. https://issuu.com/ciramorlet/docs/marinez-migueles-ciencias-y-arte-en

Mayan, M. J. (2001). Una introducción a los métodos cualitativos: módulo de entrenamiento para estudiantes y profesionales. International Institute for Qualitative Methodology. https://sites.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/pdfs/introduccion.pdf

Navarrete, J. M. (2000). El muestreo en la investigación cualitativa. Investigaciones sociales, 4(5), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.15381/is.v4i5.6851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/is.v4i5.6851

Osorio, H., & Sánchez, E. R. (2011). La cartografía como medio investigativo y pedagógico. Dearq. Revista de Arquitectura, (9), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq9.2011.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq9.2011.05

Raggi, C. B. (2014). Las paredes sí importan: análisis de la apropiación espacial en estudiantes de colegios con distintos niveles de bienestar subjetivo. Un estudio de casos. [Tesis doctoral, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso]. Archivo digital. http://opac.pucv.cl/pucv_txt/txt-6000/UCE6013_01.pdf

Universidad de Los Andes. (2018). Encuesta de Calidad de Vida. Universidad de Los Andes. https://encuestalongitudinal.uniandes.edu.co/es/

Valera, S. (1993). El significado social del espacio. Estudio de la identidad social y los aspectos simbólicos del espacio urbano desde la Psicología Ambiental. [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Archivo digital. http://www.ub.edu/escult/valera/valera.pdf

Vidal, T., Pol, E., Guàrdia, J., & Peró, M. (2004). Un modelo de apropiación del espacio mediante ecuaciones estructurales. Medio ambiente y comportamiento humano, 5(1), 27-52. https://mach.webs.ull.es/PDFS/Vol5_1y2/VOL_5_1y2_b.pdf