Populism as a complex concept: a challenge for classical definitions

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))
Published: Jun 15, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22209/rhs.v6n1a04
Keywords:
Political communication democracy value judgment conceptualization essentially contested concept categorization discourse politics

Main Article Content

Laura Toro Arenas
Universidad EAFIT Universidad de Antioquia

Abstract

An answer is proposed in this paper as to why it is hard to find consensus on which phenomena are considered as populist and which are not. It is argued that populism is an essentially contested concept (Gallie, 1998), which encompasses disparate phenomena from a particular notion of popular sovereignty within the democratic narrative, around which there are endless disputes. It is also proposed that in order to analyze populism taking into account these elements, it is necessary to acknowledge its normative nature, since classical definitions of populism fall short by not considering this component, the acknowledgement of which excludes the possibility of definitively solving the problem of the classic categorization of a phenomenon as populist or non-populist. A qualitative conceptual review methodology is used. Both the essentially contested concepts as proposed by Gallie and some insights on the conceptualization of the normative elements in social sciences by Connolly (1993) are addressed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Toro Arenas, L. (2018). Populism as a complex concept: a challenge for classical definitions. RHS-Revista Humanismo Y Sociedad, 6(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.22209/rhs.v6n1a04
Issue
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018)
Section
Reflection article
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Those authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The designated authors will retain copyright of all papers and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously published under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows third parties to share the work, as long as its author is attributed and this journal is identified as the original publisher.

  2. Authors may enter into separate, additional non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published work (e.g., post it to an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) as long as this journal is acknowledged as the original publisher.

Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional telematic archives or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work.
Author Biography

Laura Toro Arenas, Universidad EAFIT Universidad de Antioquia

Universidad EAFIT, estudiante de Ciencias Políticas. Universidad de Antioquia, estudiante de Filosofía. Medellín, Colombia.

References

Antón, Antonio. (2015). Acerca del populismo: Polarización, hegemonía y ambigüedad ideológica. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Arditi, Benjamín. (2004). El populismo como espectro de la democracia: una respuesta a Canovan. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 47(191), 86-99.

Arenas, Nelly. (2016). El chavismo sin Chávez: La deriva de un populismo sin carisma. Nueva Sociedad, 261, 13-22.

Berlin, Isaiah. (1978). Pensadores rusos. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Bobbio, Norberto. (1982). Política. Diccionario de política. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI.

Canovan, Margaret. (1981). Populism. Nueva York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt P.

Cerutti, Horacio. (2009). Populismo. Ciudad de México: Universidad nacional autónoma de México. Instituto de investigaciones sociales.

Charaudeau, Patrick. (2009). Reflexiones para el análisis del discurso populista. Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2), 253-279.

Connolly, William. (1993). The terms of political discourse. Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.

De la Torre, Carlos. (2007). ¿Es el populismo la forma constitutiva de la democracia en Latinoamérica? En: Julio Aibar Gaete (Ed.). Vox Populi. Populismo y democracia en Latinoamérica. México: FLACSO.

De la Torre, Carlos. (2013). El populismo latinoamericano, entre la democratización y el autoritarismo. Nueva Sociedad, 247, 3-17.

Dornbusch, Rudi y Edwards, Sebastián. (1990). La Macroeconomía del populismo en América Latina. El Trimestre Económico, 57(225), 21-162.

Gallie, Walter. (1998). Conceptos esencialmente impugnados. Cuadernos de crítica, 49, 1- 42.

Gerring, John. (1997). Ideology: A definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 957-994.

Green, William. (2013). Gaitanismo, liberalismo de izquierda y movilización popular. Medellín: Fondo editorial universidad EAFIT.

Fairclough, I. y Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Londres: Routledge.

Hermet, Guy. (2003). El populismo como concepto. Revista de Ciencia Política, 23(1), 5-18.

Kaiser, Axel y Álvarez, Gloria. (2016) El engaño populista. Por qué se arruinan nuestros países y cómo rescatarlos. Barcelona: Ediciones Deusto.

Laclau, Ernesto. (2005). La razón populista. Buenos Aires: Fondo de cultura económica.

Levitsky, Steven, y Loxton, James. (2013). Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization, 20(1), 107-136.

McRae, Donald. (1969). Populism as an ideology. En: Gellner, Ernest y Ionescu, Ghita. (Eds), Populism. Its Meanings and National Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

Melo, Julián. (2014). Los tiempos del populismo. Devenir de una categoría polisémica. Colombia Internacional, 82, 71-98.

Mudde, Cas y Rovira, Cristóbal. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Müller, Jan Werner. (2016). What Is Populism? Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Ortiz, Egda. (2009). Populismo y democracia en América Latina. Frónesis. 16(1), 43-62.

Palacios, Marco. (2011). Populistas: el poder de las palabras. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Pitkin, Hanna. (1972) The Concept of Representation. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Shils, Edward. (1956). The Torment of Secrecy: The Background and Consequences of American Security Policies. New York: Wiley

Vogel, Steffen. (2016). La tentación autoritaria: La nueva izquierda europea: entre el resurgimiento y el populismo. Nueva Sociedad, 261, 139-149.

Weyland, Kurt. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative politics, 34(1), 1-22.

Wiles, Peter (1969) A syndrome not a doctrine: some elementary thesis on populism. En: Gellner, Ernest y Ionescu, Ghita. (Eds). Populism. Its Meanings and National Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson

Wodak, Ruth. (2009). The Discourse of Politics in Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan

Worsley, Peter. (1969). The concept of populism. En: Gellner, Ernest y Ionescu, Ghita. (Eds), Populism. Its Meanings and National Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

Zaibert, Leo, y Smith, Barry. (2010). The Varieties of Normativity: An Essay on Social Ontology. En: Tsohatzidis, S. (Ed) Intentional Acts and Institutional Facts: Essays on John Searle's Social Ontology. Dordrecht: Springer.

Zanatta, Loris. (2014). Populismo. Buenos Aires: Katz.