About the Journal
EDITORIAL POLICIES
Focus and Scope
The purpose of RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad, of the Humanities Directorate, Corporación Universitaria Remington (Uniremington), is to contribute to dissemination of research, reviews, analyses and theoretical developments related to humanistic, social and educational issues. The journal publishes unpublished articles both in Spanish and in English that contribute to the discussion of national and international interest on human and social development. It is a digital ongoing publication with two closing periods every six months (January-June and July-December).
The journal is intended for professionals, researchers, students and a general audience interested in humanistic studies, social and educational topics, and it enables the dialogue of knowledge between institutions and communities. Both the decisions and approaches of RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad adhere to all the applicable national and international copyright guidelines. Additionally, the quality requirements of the indexing and abstracting systems are met by the publication.
This journal does not charge APC (Article Processing Charge) or any other fee for the various editorial processes. This is a Diamond Open Access journal.
Referee and peer review process
Once an article is submitted by the author for assessment, the journal editor and editorial assistant carefully review compliance with the rules defined in the author guidelines. When the editorial assessment has been completed, the editorial board recommends two reviewers for the original research manuscripts, reflection articles derived from research, review articles and topical review article; and one reviewer for reflection papers not derived from research. This journal uses double-blind review; therefore, both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. These reviewers can be national or international and, preferably, external to the publishing institution. Reviewers report their opinion about an article by filling in a review form, where they assess the clarity, coherence, suitability and relevance of the submitted article, including the problem statement, the introduction, the methodology, the results, the discussion and conclusions sections. In addition, reviewers assess whether the manuscript ostensibly contributes to the conservation, transmission, expansion or renewal of current knowledge on the subject.
Once the feedback of reviewers have been submitted and received, the committee decides to accept the article without changes, accept it after revisions or reject it for publication. Where the reviewers differ in their recommendation to accept the manuscript or not, an additional reviewer is asked to evaluate the manuscript and the editorial board, taking into account the arguments of all of them, ultimately decides whether to publish it or not. In any case, the editorial board reserves the right to publish or refuse publication of the articles submitted.
The article publication process will only be effective if the author agrees to make the changes proposed by the reviewers and resubmit them to the editor promptly through OJS. The author should respond through comments inside the article to each of the reviewer comments, either detailing how each review comment was addressed and the changes that were made or providing reasoning why the reviewer comment was not addressed.
The editorial board makes the final decision to publish the papers submitted to the journal, based on compliance with the established editorial guidelines and in accordance with the feedback of peer reviewers.
The acceptance of the paper for publication entails the express authorization from the authors to the journal to edit, reproduce, translate and disclose by any means the information contained in it. Neither Corporación Universitaria Remington nor RHS will be responsible for the views contained in the published papers. Responsibility for the work’s content falls entirely and exclusively on the authors. This authorization is made in the authors' certificate. The estimated lasting time for the editorial process from reception up to the final decision of the editorial board is 8 months.
Open Access Policy
The journal adopts the diamond open access policy, that is, it does not have article processing charges (APC) or author fees for article publication or for any of the editorial processes. This is possible because the journal is funded by the publishing institution. Additionally, readers and authors are informed that RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad is an open access journal. This means that all content is freely available, at no charge to the user or their institution. Users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of the articles in this journal without requesting prior permission from the editor or the author, as long as proper referencing is made to the source. This is in accordance with the definition of open access offered by the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI). RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad is under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution-Non-commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Guidelines to authors who want to publish in RHS
Authors wishing to publish in RHS should refer to Instrucciones a los autores (author guidelines) section that appears at the top of the journal homepage.
Or they can click on this link: Guidelines
Anti-plagiarism policy
All the manuscripts sent to the journal will be checked for potential plagiarism with Turnitin, a plagiarism detection software. If total or partial plagiarism is detected (without the corresponding citation of references), the text is not sent for evaluation and the author is alerted of the reason for rejection.
Plagiarism is a major issue worldwide and papers that either plagiarize or breach copyright prove poor editorial quality and thus will be immediately rejected.
Declaration of editorial ethics and good practices
The declaration of editorial ethics and good practices of RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad seeks to ensure editorial quality, transparency and integrity throughout the publishing process of articles submitted to the journal. The ethical principles governing the publication of articles in RHS are based on the international regulations proposed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing (DOAJ) and common standards for journals and digital content publication.
a. Contribution and authorship policies
Authors certify in the Author declaration form that they know the criteria required by RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad, its scope, author regulations, use policies and documents for authors; that the manuscript submitted is an original and unpublished work (unpublished means a manuscript that has not previously been published in Spanish or any other language); that it is a product of their own intellectual creation and that is not simultaneously under consideration for publication by any other journal or publishing body. Please notice that no more than five authors should be involved per article.
Authors have the right to have their manuscripts reviewed fairly and impartially, within a reasonable time frame. They also have the right to be respectfully treated in their engagement with the journal.
Given the fact that RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad adheres to the policies of the Colombian journal measurement system of specialized scientific journals (Publindex) —from the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation—, authors are required, if they have Colombian nationality, to comply with the following requirements before submitting an article for publication:
- Be registered in CvLAC ((Latin American and Caribbean Curriculum Vitae).
- Be registered for an ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID).
b. Policies on competing interests
Reviewers must disclose in writing on the Evaluation form the existence of a relationship between the reviewer and the authors of the article to be reviewed, from which a potential competing interest could arise. If there is a competing interest, the editor of the journal must be informed immediately, who will in turn inform the editorial board to take the appropriate measure in order not to affect the editorial process.
c. Policies on data sharing and reproducibility
The editor of the journal must abide by the laws of their jurisdiction regarding privacy. Regardless of local statutes, they must always safeguard the privacy of personal data collected during a research study or professional interaction.
d. Intellectual property policy
Sources must be properly acknowledged, authors who have used the work of others must cite them correctly. The journal submits all manuscripts it receives to a similarity detection tool. When total or partial similarity is detected (without the corresponding citation) that suggests plagiarism, the text is not sent for review and the reason for rejection is communicated to the author. Plagiarism is a major issue worldwide and papers that either plagiarize or breach copyright provide poor editorial quality and thus will be immediately rejected.
e. Open access policy
The journal has no article processing charges (APC) or author fees for article publication or for any of the editorial processes. This is possible because the journal is funded by the publishing institution. Additionally, readers and authors are informed that RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad is an open access journal. This means that all content is freely available, at no charge to the user or their institution. Users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of the articles in this journal without requesting prior permission from the editor or the author, as long as proper referencing is made to the source. This is in accordance with the definition of open access offered by the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI). RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad is under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution-Non-commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
f. Research ethics policy
For original research articles, a statement must be included that the researchers conformed to Colombian and international ethical provisions in their study, ensuring that sensitive data of individuals and respect for information are safeguarded.
g. Retraction Policy
RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad is committed to scientific integrity, editorial transparency, and best practices in academic publishing. In accordance with editorial quality standards and the international guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the journal establishes the following policy for managing retractions related to published content.
The journal may retract an article when there is evidence that its results, content, or editorial processes present serious irregularities affecting the scientific reliability or ethical integrity of the publication. Retractions may result from situations such as plagiarism or self-plagiarism, data fabrication or falsification, improper manipulation of information, duplicate or redundant publication, non-compliance with research ethics principles, fraudulent authorship, serious methodological errors that invalidate the results, or undeclared ethical conflicts.
The editor will conduct a preliminary assessment of each reported case and formally notify the authors involved, who may submit clarifications, explanations, or supporting documentation within the timeframe established by the journal. Subsequently, the Editorial Committee will analyze the available evidence and, when necessary, may consult affiliated institutions, external reviewers, or academic verification and similarity-detection tools. Once the review process has concluded, the final decision will be formally communicated to the authors.
If a retraction is determined, the original article will remain accessible as part of the journal’s scholarly record, but it will be clearly identified as “Retracted.” In addition, an editorial note explaining the reasons for the decision will be published, and the retraction will be linked to the article’s DOI and metadata. When appropriate, the journal will notify indexing systems and bibliographic databases of the decision. The journal RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad will avoid removing published articles except in cases where legal or judicial requirements make such action necessary.
The Journal RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad guarantees that all processes related to retractions will be conducted under the principles of editorial transparency, due process, confidentiality, and scientific integrity. Likewise, the journal will ensure the preservation of the scholarly record and the implementation of international editorial best practices in accordance with ethical and quality standards for scientific publications.
In order to ensure the traceability and transparency of retractions, the journal will implement mechanisms for metadata updates, linkage between articles and retraction notices, DOI preservation, and visible identification of changes within the OJS platform. Likewise, when appropriate, the journal will communicate retractions to indexes, indexing systems, and academic databases.
General terms of use
RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad is under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution-Non-commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
With this license you are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Use of interoperability protocols
RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad is published in the OJS platform that uses the standard OAI-PMH (Open Archives Initiative – Protocol for Metadata Harvesting) that allows other websites and information services to harvest the published content metadata according to Dublin Core criteria.
Archive and self-archiving policy
The PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN) allows publishers of OJS journals to digitally preserve their content. This means in the event that a journal stops publishing or goes offline, there will be a way to have continued long-term access to articles and issues. In addition, the articles are deposited in the institutional repository: https://repositorio.uniremington.edu.co/handle/123456789/13
RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad maintains a self-archiving policy that grants authors the freedom to archive the postprint version of the article and to publish and disseminate it in other electronic media (personal websites, institutional repositories, blogs) under the conditions of the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA) licence, as long as they provide bibliographic information accrediting their first publication in the journal.
Guidelines for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad
The guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad are based on the following principles:
- All users of AI must explicitly disclose the use of these tools. Concealing or disguising the use of AI systems at any stage of the editorial process is not permitted.
- Only human beings can be authors of scientific works. AI tools are auxiliary instruments, not creative or intellectual actors. The human author bears solely and full responsibility for the final content.
- The use of AI must not compromise the originality, accuracy, methodological validity, or academic rigor of the work. AI should function as a tool that supports research, never as its substitute.
- Authors must validate, critically review, and correct any AI-generated or AI-assisted content. The author retains full responsibility for all claims, data, and interpretations included in the manuscript.
Permitted Uses of AI Tools
RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad recognizes the value of artificial intelligence (AI) as a legitimate tool in academic activities. The use of AI is permitted in the following auxiliary functions:
For Authors
Permitted Uses:
- Reorganizing paragraphs and summarizing key points from the author’s research.
- Supporting the preliminary analysis of statistical or qualitative data generated by the author.
- Creating visual representations of the author’s data.
- Generating preliminary ideas, alternative hypotheses, or theoretical frameworks for the author’s consideration.
- Summarizing findings from existing literature (always properly cited).
- Using originality verification tools.
Prohibited Uses:
- Drafting the main or substantial portions of a manuscript using AI tools.
- Generating false or manipulated data, results, or analyses.
- Replacing the author’s critical interpretation with AI-generated syntheses.
- Using AI to infer conclusions not supported by the research conducted.
- Fabricating bibliographic references or data.
- Using AI to generate content presented as the author’s original analysis without meaningful human intellectual contribution.
For editors
Permitted Uses:
- Assisting in the verification of formal requirements (format, length, basic structure).
- Supporting the preliminary identification of potential reviewers based on keywords and expertise profiles (with final human review).
- Verifying originality and conducting initial plagiarism screenings.
- Improving editorial quality and formatting consistency.
- Generating automated summaries of reviewer reports to support editorial analysis.
Permitted Uses:
- Making final acceptance or rejection decisions based solely on AI analysis.
- Using AI to assess the scientific quality or academic impact of a manuscript.
- Replacing human editorial judgment with automated recommendations.
For Reviewers
Prohibited Uses:
- Using generative AI tools to assist in the critical appraisal of manuscripts.
- Inputting manuscripts into large language models for analysis.
- Generating peer-review reports using AI tools.
- Using AI tools to make evaluative judgments about the methodology, results, or conclusions of a manuscript.
Rationale: Peer review requires original critical thinking, expert evaluation, and personal accountability—elements that cannot be delegated to automated systems. Rigor and originality in the review process are essential to maintaining the integrity of the editorial process.
Reporting Obligations
When submitting a manuscript, authors must complete the required declaration regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools indicating the following:
[ ] No generative AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript
[ ] Generative AI tools were used. Please briefly describe the tool(s) used and their purpose:
Likewise, any manuscript that uses AI tools must include a paragraph in the introduction or methodology section, indicating the use of AI in the research process and in the preparation of the article.
In this paragraph, the authors must specify:
- Tools used: the exact name, version, and developer (e.g., ChatGPT-4, OpenAI, 2025).
- Specific purpose: the task for which the AI tool was used (e.g., “ChatGPT-4 was used to assist with grammar editing of the manuscript”).
- Stage of the process: the stage at which the AI tool was used (writing, analysis, revision, figure generation, etc.).
- Representative prompts: when applicable, examples of the prompts or commands used.
- Review and validation: a description of how the author reviewed, validated, and corrected the AI-generated content.
- Impact on the work: a brief explanation of how the use of AI tools did not compromise the originality or integrity of the research.
Example:
Grammarly (Grammarly Inc., 2025) was used for grammatical, spelling, and stylistic corrections of the manuscript, without altering the ideas, arguments, or results. ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2025) was used solely to assist with sentence reformulation and to improve clarity in the Discussion section, while maintaining the substantive content defined by the authors. No artificial intelligence tools were used for data generation, results analysis, or the development of theoretical interpretations.
AI Citation Guidelines
When AI tools are used as sources or to generate specific content, they must be properly cited in the reference list.
OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (Version 4.0) [Software]. https://chat.openai.com
DeepL. (2025). DeepL Translate [Software]. https://www.deepl.com
Example of in-text citation:
“Data synthesis was performed using ChatGPT-4 (OpenAI, 2025) as a support tool for thematic organization.”
AI-Generated Images
When authors include AI-generated images, they must:
- Clearly indicate this in the caption.
- Specify the AI tool used (name, version, and developer, if available).
- Justify the purpose of its use (e.g., illustrative purposes, for exemplification, etc.).
Example: “Figure 3. Conceptual representation of digital humanization processes (Generated with DALL-E 3, OpenAI, 2025, for illustrative purposes).”
AI Detection Tools
RHS will implement automated tools to detect potential misuse of artificial intelligence (AI). These tools serve to complement the editorial process and will not be used as the final basis for editorial decisions. Accordingly, AI detection software will be used during the preliminary stage of manuscript review. If the detection process identifies potential AI-generated content, the manuscript will undergo a more thorough human editorial review. Authors will be notified of any findings related to potential misuse and will be given the opportunity to respond and provide clarification. RHS recognizes that AI detection tools have margins of error, may produce false positives (particularly in highly specialized or technical texts). Therefore, such tools are not sufficient on their own to determine academic integrity. Human evaluation remains essential and irreplaceable components of the review process.
Journal History
The first volume (issues 1 and 2) of RHS (Revista Humanismo y Sociedad) was published in 2013. At that time, the journal was directed by Margarita María Zapata and edited by Héctor Jiménez. It was designed as a biannual electronic publication of Corporación Universitaria Remington (Uniremington) and aimed at disseminating scholarly information pertaining to areas of human sciences, which could contribute to human and social development. It was intended as a meeting place for authors’ and readers’ opinions, an "opportunity to communicate our own vision about the dynamics of our communities", as stated in the first issue by its founding director. Furthermore, it was part of the institution’s claim, as stated by its former president Pedro Juan González, to promote the dissemination of papers that consolidated the intellectual heritage of the university community.
In 2015, the journal went through a transitional period where it underwent profound structural changes, which is why just a single issue was published. In 2016, Lina María Yassin Noreña, Phd., became the journal editorial director and Isabel Cristina Serna Salazar, Mgr., was appointed its editor. That year began with a new spirit, namely, to promote the quality and philosophy of the journal as well as to preserve the highest standards in order to strengthen and contribute to research in social sciences and humanities. In volume 4, issue 1, 2016, a section called Tapa abierta (open cover) was launched as a space for artists to share their vision of the world and society through a photograph or illustration, which would appear in the cover of some of the journal issues. In 2018, the designer Oscar Mauricio Morales joined the editorial team. From volume 6, he redesigned and changed the visual style of the journal, giving it a fresh look.
Since 2019 RHS-Revista Humanismo y Universidad has been accepted to different databases like Latindex, REDIB, Dialnet, CLASE, Erihplus, and AmeliCA.
