Review of studies on elements of materiality in sustainability assurance in corporate reporting

Main Article Content

Miseldra Gil-Marín
Víctor Hugo Lindsay Sanmartin
María Zulema Urzua Pérez
Pamela Antonieta San Martín Morales
Claudio Vásquez- Millalén

Abstract

In the current context, where corporate sustainability is increasingly relevant, understanding the elements of Materiality and their impact on sustainability assurance is essential. This review analyzes the components of materiality and their contribution to corporate sustainability reports. Based on a thorough examination of 150 scientific articles, 6 key studies were selected that address economic, social, and environmental impact; transparency and disclosure; measurement and monitoring; and effective Ccommunication. The PRISMA method and PICOS strategy were used to select these articles. The importance of economic, social, and environmental impact, particularly from the Triple Bottom Line perspective, is emphasized for a comprehensive evaluation of corporate sustainability. Significant omissions were identified in areas such as carbon footprint, gender diversity, water resource management, and occupational safety, highlighting the need to include these factors in a more complete assessment. The analysis underscores the relevance of transparency and disclosure in reports, and effective communication is identified as crucial for the perceived credibility of sustainability reports.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gil-Marín, M., Lindsay Sanmartin, V. H. ., Urzua Pérez, M. Z. ., San Martín Morales, P. A., & Vásquez- Millalén, C. (2024). Review of studies on elements of materiality in sustainability assurance in corporate reporting. Accounting and Management Research, 3, 20. https://doi.org/10.22209/amr.v3a04.2024
Section
Artículo de revisión sistemática

References

Abrizah, A., Zainab, AN, Kiran, K. (2013). Impacto científico de las revistas LIS y categorización temática: una comparación entre Web of Science y Scopus. Cienciometría, 94 , 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0813-7

Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the environment, 23(4), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767

An, E. (2023). Accelerating sustainability through better reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(4), 904-914. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2022-0453

Arachchi, J., & Managi, S. (2021). Preferences for energy sustainability: Different effects of gender on knowledge and importance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 141, 110767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110767

Baumüller, J., & Sopp, K. (2021). Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: Review, outlook and implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 8-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2021-0114

Belkhir, L., Bernard, S., & Abdelgadir, S. (2017). Does GRI reporting impact environmental sustainability? A cross-industry analysis of CO2 emissions performance between GRI-reporting and non-reporting companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 28(2), 138-155. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-10-2015-0191

Beske, F., Haustein, E., & Lorson, P. C. (2020). Materiality analysis in sustainability and integrated reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 162- https://doi.org/186. 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2018-0343

Biedenweg, K., Monroe, M. C., & Oxarart, A. (2013). The importance of teaching ethics of sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371311288912

Bunclark, L. A., & Scott, G. J. (2022). Benchmarking corporate water reporting in emerging economies: the case of Peru. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(1), 114-151. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2020-0031

Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2016). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 248-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.005

Castleman, B., & Sellers, C. (2008). Code of sustainable practice in occupational and environmental health and safety for corporations. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 14(3), 234-235. https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2008.14.3.234

Cho, C., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, organizations and society, 40, 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003

Clayton, A., Rogerson, J., & Rampedi, I. (2015). Integrated reporting vs. sustainability reporting for corporate responsibility in South Africa. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic series, (29), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1515/bog-2015-0021

Correa, J. P., Montalvo-Navarrete, J. M., & Hidalgo-Salazar, M. A. (2019). Carbon footprint considerations for biocomposite materials for sustainable products: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.099

Fadlallah, R., El-Harakeh, A., Bou-Karroum, L., Lotfi, T., El-Jardali, F., Hishi, L., & Akl, E. A. (2020). A common framework of steps and criteria for prioritizing topics for evidence syntheses: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 120, 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.009

Farinós, J. M. (2017). Sustainability as an object of corporate social responsibility. VITRUVIO-International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability, 2(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2017.7649

Farooq, M., Zaman, R., Sarraj, D., & Khalid, F. (2021). Examining the extent of and drivers for materiality assessment disclosures in sustainability reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 12(5), 965-1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2020-0113

García-Muiña, F., Medina-Salgado, M. S., González-Sánchez, R., Huertas-Valdivia, I., Ferrari, A. M., & Settembre-Blundo, D. (2021). Industry 4.0-based dynamic Social Organizational Life Cycle Assessment to target the social circular economy in manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327, 129439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129439

García-Sánchez, I. M., Minutiello, V., & Tettamanzi, P. (2022). Gender disclosure: The impact of peer behaviour and the firm’s equality policies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2207

Hamad, S., Draz, M. U., & Lai, F. W. (2020). The impact of corporate governance and sustainability reporting on integrated reporting: A conceptual framework. Sage Open, 10(2), 2158244020927431. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020927431

Hancu-Budui, A., & Zorio-Grima, A. (2021). Supreme audit institutions in Europe: synergies, institutional transparency, gender equality and sustainability engagement. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2021-0116

Hodgman, K. L. (2006). The sustainability analysis framework: an effective knowledge communication tool in a whole of government context. Systems, Cybernetics and Information, 5(3), 64-69. https://www.iiisci.org/journal/pdv/sci/pdfs/P777570.pdf

Hsu, C., Lee, W., & Chao, W. (2013). Materiality analysis model in sustainability reporting: A case study at Lite-On Technology Corporation. Journal of cleaner production, 57, 142-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.040

Hussain, M., Wang, W., & Wang, Y. (2022). Natural resources, consumer prices and financial development in China: Measures to control carbon emissions and ecological footprints. Resources Policy, 78, 102880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102880

Ibáñez-Forés, V., Martínez-Sánchez, V., Valls-Val, K., & Bovea, M. D. (2023). How do organisations communicate aspects related to their social performance? A proposed set of indicators and metrics for sustainability reporting. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.024

Ioris, A. A., Hunter, C., & Walker, S. (2008). The development and application of water management sustainability indicators in Brazil and Scotland. Journal of environmental management, 88(4), 1190-1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.007

Ivic, A., Saviolidis, N. M., & Johannsdottir, L. (2021). Drivers of sustainability practices and contributions to sustainable development evident in sustainability reports of European mining companies. Discover Sustainability, 2, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-021-00025-y

Jin, D.; Szolovits, P. (2020). Advancing PICO element detection in biomedical text via deep neural networks. Bioinformatics, 36, 3856–3862. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa256

Khan, S., & Orfi, J. (2021). Socio-economic and environmental impact of nuclear desalination. Water, 13(12), 16 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121637

Kim MJ, Petrick JF. (2021) The effect of herding behaviors on dual-route processing of communications aimed at tourism crowdfunding ventures. Journal of Travel Research, 60(5):947-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520919515

Knierim, A., Bieling, C., & Zander, P. (2021). How researchers shape the construction of landscape change–insights from a scenario study. Landscape Research, 46(8), 1057-1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2021.1940116

Koskela, M. (2014). Occupational health and safety in corporate social responsibility reports. Safety science, 68, 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.011

Ma, B., Bashir, M. F., Peng, X., Strielkowski, W., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2023). Analyzing research trends of universities’ carbon footprint: An integrative review. Gondwana Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.05.008

Machado, B. A. A., Dias, L. C. P., & Fonseca, A. (2021). Transparency of materiality analysis in GRI-based sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 570-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2066

Maroun, W. (2019). Does external assurance contribute to higher quality integrated reports?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(4), 106670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.06.002

Martínez-Navalón, J. G., Gelashvili, V., DeMatos, N., & Herrera-Enríquez, G. (2023). Exploring the impact of digital knowledge management on technostress and sustainability. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2022-0544

Methley, A.M.; Campbell, S.; Chew-Graham, C.; McNally, R.; Cheraghi-Sohi, S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2014, 14, 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0

Mongeon, P.; Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228. 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Moroney, R., & Trotman, K. T. (2016). Differences in auditors’ materiality assessments when auditing financial statements and sustainability reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 551-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12162

Morris, J., Sassen, R., & McGuinness, M. (2023). Beyond water scarcity and efficiency? Water sustainability disclosures in corporate reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. https://doi.org/110.1108/SAMPJ-11-2021-0495

Najar, N., & Persson, K. M. (2021). A sustainability index within water and wastewater management in Sweden: An evaluation of eight case studies. Water, 13(14), 1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13141879

Nakra, N., & Kashyap, V. (2023). Investigating the link between socially-responsible HRM and organizational sustainability performance–an HRD perspective. European Journal of Training and Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-02-2023-0019

Nigri, G., & Del Baldo, M. (2018). Sustainability reporting and performance measurement systems: How do small-and medium-sized benefit corporations manage integration?. Sustainability, 10(12), 4499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124499

Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E. A.; Brennan, S.E. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br. Med. J., 372,71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peršić, M., Janković, S., Krivačić, D. (2017). Contabilidad de sostenibilidad: mejora de la responsabilidad social corporativa. En: Aluchna, M., Idowu, S. (eds) La dinámica de la responsabilidad social corporativa. RSC, Sostenibilidad, Ética y Gobernanza. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39089-5_15

Puroila, J., & Mäkelä, H. (2019). Matter of opinion: Exploring the socio-political nature of materiality disclosures in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(4), 1043-1072. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2016-2788

Rožanc, I. (2018). Effective collection and selection of research articles for a systematic review. In 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) (pp. 1394-1399). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400251

Saczyna, M. (2019). Neuroscience in Linguistic Patterns of Communication Campaigns for Environmental Sustainability. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 14(1), 109-118. file:///C:/Users/misel/Downloads/Neuroscience_in_Linguistic_Patterns.pdf

Shahbaz, W., & Sajjad, A. (2021). Integrating management control systems, mindfulness and sustainability: an occupational health and safety perspective. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 433-449. https://doi.org/110.1108/CG-06-2020-0242

Singh, VK, Singh, P., Karmakar, M. et al (2021). La cobertura de la revista Web of Science, Scopus y Dimensions: un análisis comparativo. Cienciometría, 126, 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5

Singhal, N., Gupta, H., & Mittal, G. (2018). Importance-performance analysis to identify effective learning approaches for sustainability in an Indian business school. Vision, 22(3), 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262918785963

Stacchezzini, R., Melloni, G., & Lai, A. (2016). Sustainability management and reporting: the role of integrated reporting for communicating corporate sustainability management. Journal of cleaner production, 136, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.109

Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Furlotti, K. (2020). The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 470-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1813

Urrutia, G.; Bonfill, X. (2010). PRISMA declaration: A proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. 516 Med. Clin., 135, 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015

Vallet-Bellmunt, T., Fuertes-Fuertes, I., & Flor, M. L. (2023). Reporting Sustainable Development Goal 12 in the Spanish food retail industry. An analysis based on Global Reporting Initiative performance indicators. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 695-707. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2382

Valls Martinez, M. D. C., Cruz Rambaud, S., & Parra Oller, I. M. (2019). Gender policies on board of directors and sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1539-1553. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1825

Vigneau, L., & Adams, C. A. (2023). The failure of transparency as self-regulation. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2022-0051

Wadood, S. A., Sadiq Jajja, M. S., Chatha, K. A., & Farooq, S. (2023). Lean, sustainability and the triple bottom line performance: a systems perspective-based empirical examination. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(6), 1719-1739. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2021-0347

Xiao, X., & Shailer, G. (2022). Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports. The British Accounting Review, 54(1), 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101002

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.